James, R v

James, R v

The sentence of 10 years' imprisonment was not manifestly excessive and properly reflected the need for deterrence in cases of treachery, especially where the offender was in a position of trust in a war zone, even though no direct operational damage was caused.

Parties
Prosecution: R; Appellant: Daniel James
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
25 June 2009
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Official Secrets, Espionage, Sentencing, Treachery
Criminal Law National Security Official Secrets Espionage Sentencing Treachery

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

R

Prosecution

Daniel James

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed for communicating information useful to an enemy was manifestly excessive
  2. 2 Whether the deterrent element in sentencing for treachery was properly applied

Ratio Decidendi

The sentence of 10 years' imprisonment was not manifestly excessive and properly reflected the need for deterrence in cases of treachery, especially where the offender was in a position of trust in a war zone, even though no direct operational damage was caused.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal against sentence is dismissed.