Martin, R, v [2017] EWCA Crim 648 (25 May 2017)
The sentence of reduction in rank was not manifestly excessive or wrong in principle, given the aggravating factors of assaults in drink by a senior non-commissioned officer on a subordinate, and the need to uphold operational effectiveness and discipline. The financial consequences were not sufficient to warrant...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] EWCA Crim 648
- Parties
- Respondent: Regina; Appellant: Daniel Jeffrey Martin
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 May 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Common Assault, Sentencing, Military Discipline, Reduction in Rank
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Respondent
Daniel Jeffrey Martin
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence of reduction in rank imposed by the court martial was manifestly excessive or wrong in principle
- 2 Whether the financial consequences of reduction in rank should affect the appropriateness of the sentence
Ratio Decidendi
The sentence of reduction in rank was not manifestly excessive or wrong in principle, given the aggravating factors of assaults in drink by a senior non-commissioned officer on a subordinate, and the need to uphold operational effectiveness and discipline. The financial consequences were not sufficient to warrant intervention, and the sentencing board properly considered all relevant factors.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- No change to sentence; reduction in rank to Bombardier stands
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment