Kamara, R v (Rev 1)

The applicant's knowledge that others in his group were armed with knives and his role in starting the disorder resulted in high culpability and justified the sentence imposed, despite mitigation.

Parties: Prosecution: Regina; Applicant: Daniel Kamara
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
Judgment Date: 28 August 2020
Procedural Posture: Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome: application for leave to appeal refused
Legal Topics: Manslaughter, Unlawful Wounding, Sentencing Guidelines, Joint Enterprise

Criminal Law Manslaughter Unlawful Wounding Sentencing Guidelines Joint Enterprise

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3

Parties

Regina

Prosecution

Daniel Kamara

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

1 Whether the sentence of eleven years' imprisonment for manslaughter was justified given the applicant's role and lack of direct involvement with a knife
2 Whether mitigation factors such as age and lack of previous convictions warranted a reduction in sentence

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant's knowledge that others in his group were armed with knives and his role in starting the disorder resulted in high culpability and justified the sentence imposed, despite mitigation.

Court Disposition

application for leave to appeal refused

Orders

renewed application for leave to appeal against sentence is refused