R v Daniel Lloyd & Anor
The sentences imposed on the appellants were too long as insufficient discount was given for attempted offences and the totality principle was not properly applied; the sentences were reduced to achieve just and proportionate outcomes.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Rex; Appellant: Daniel Lloyd; Appellant: Layton Doran
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 December 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Sentence Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed; sentences reduced
- Legal Topics
- Burglary, Attempted Burglary, Dangerous Driving, Aggravated Vehicle Taking, Sentencing, Totality, Guilty Plea Credit, Driving Disqualification
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecutor
Daniel Lloyd
Appellant
Layton Doran
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Sentence Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentences imposed on the appellants were manifestly excessive
- 2 Whether appropriate discounts were applied for attempted offences
- 3 Whether the principle of totality was properly considered in sentencing
Ratio Decidendi
The sentences imposed on the appellants were too long as insufficient discount was given for attempted offences and the totality principle was not properly applied; the sentences were reduced to achieve just and proportionate outcomes.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed; sentences reduced
Orders
- Sentences on counts 5 and 6 for Lloyd quashed and replaced with four years' imprisonment each; count 5 concurrent with count 1, count 6 consecutive to count 1; sentence on count 7 to run concurrently with count 6; total sentence for Lloyd is nine years' imprisonment.
- Sentences on counts 6 and 8 for Doran quashed and replaced with five years' imprisonment on count 6 (less 203 days for qualifying curfew) and 12 months' imprisonment on count 8, to run concurrently; total sentence for Doran is five years' imprisonment less 203 days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment