Cummins, R v [2020] EWCA Crim 1434 (08 October 2020)
The sentencing judge was entitled to make her own factual findings consistent with the jury's verdicts, the credit for guilty plea was properly limited to 10% as the plea was entered on the first day of trial, and the finding of dangerousness and imposition of an extended sentence were justified on the evidence and not wrong in principle.
- Citation
- [2020] EWCA Crim 1434
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Appellant: Daniel Marcus Cummins
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 October 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Robbery, Unlawful Wounding, Dangerous Offender, Sentencing Guidelines, Credit for Guilty Plea, Factual Basis for Sentencing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
Daniel Marcus Cummins
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentencing judge sentenced on a factual basis inconsistent with the jury's verdicts
- 2 Whether greater credit should have been given for the guilty plea
- 3 Whether the judge was wrong to find the appellant a dangerous offender and impose an extended sentence
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge was entitled to make her own factual findings consistent with the jury's verdicts, the credit for guilty plea was properly limited to 10% as the plea was entered on the first day of trial, and the finding of dangerousness and imposition of an extended sentence were justified on the evidence and not wrong in principle.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment