Hall v R [2013] EWCA Crim 82 (08 February 2013)
Imprisonment of the appellant did not inevitably amount to inhuman or degrading treatment under Article 3 ECHR, nor did it breach Article 2 ECHR; however, given the exceptional impact of imprisonment on the appellant's health and subsequent deterioration, the sentence should be reduced as an exceptional act of mercy.
- Citation
- [2013] EWCA Crim 82
- Parties
- Appellant: Daniel Patrick Roque Hall; Respondent: The Queen
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 February 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Article 2 ECHR, Article 3 ECHR, Serious Crime Prevention Order, Mitigation Due to Medical Condition
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Daniel Patrick Roque Hall
Appellant
The Queen
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether imprisonment of a severely disabled offender constitutes inhuman or degrading treatment under Article 3 ECHR or a breach of Article 2 ECHR
- 2 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive given the appellant's medical condition
Ratio Decidendi
Imprisonment of the appellant did not inevitably amount to inhuman or degrading treatment under Article 3 ECHR, nor did it breach Article 2 ECHR; however, given the exceptional impact of imprisonment on the appellant's health and subsequent deterioration, the sentence should be reduced as an exceptional act of mercy.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Sentence reduced to 18 months' imprisonment, representing time served
- Serious Crime Prevention Order imposed for three years restricting travel and requiring surrender of passports
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment