R v Daniel Plackett
The compensation order for Ms Taylor was appropriate given her physical and mental injuries and the appellant’s means, but the order for PC Keat was manifestly excessive given the lesser injury and should be reduced to £700. The judge should have made a more direct inquiry and given reasons, but had sufficient information to make the orders.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Rex; Appellant: Daniel Plackett
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence (compensation Orders)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Compensation Orders, Assessment of Means, Sentencing Guidelines
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecutor
Daniel Plackett
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence (compensation Orders)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the compensation orders were commensurate with the injuries sustained
- 2 Whether the judge failed to invite submissions on compensation and failed to consider the appellant's means
- 3 Whether the judge gave adequate reasons for the compensation orders
Ratio Decidendi
The compensation order for Ms Taylor was appropriate given her physical and mental injuries and the appellant’s means, but the order for PC Keat was manifestly excessive given the lesser injury and should be reduced to £700. The judge should have made a more direct inquiry and given reasons, but had sufficient information to make the orders.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Compensation order for Ms Taylor (£2,000) upheld; instalments to continue as previously ordered.
- Compensation order for PC Keat reduced from £2,000 to £700; no further compensation payable to PC Keat.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment