THJ Systems Ltd & Anor v Sheridan & Anor [2024] EWHC 3195 (Ch) (16 December 2024)
The court found that the claimants had established, on the balance of probabilities, that the defendants' breaches of advertising obligations caused a loss of profits, and that the methodology for calculating damages, while based on assumptions, was reasonable and supported by available evidence and expert audit. The court accepted a revised, more conservative figure for loss of profits (£3,358,079.86) and found that the defendants' failure to comply with disclosure and debarring orders did not relieve the claimants of the burden of proof, but justified resolving uncertainties in the claimants' favour. The court also found that the copyright infringement was established but limited to two...
- Citation
- [2024] EWHC 3195 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: THJ Systems Limited; Claimant: OptionNet LLP; Defendant: Daniel Sheridan; Defendant: Sheridan Options Mentoring Corporation
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 December 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Inquiry as to Damages Following Trial on Liability (chancery Division, Business List) / Assessment of Damages After Liability Judgment and Appeal
- Outcome
- Damages awarded to claimants for Advertising Breaches in the sum of £3,358,079.86; damages for copyright infringement to be assessed separately; defendants remain debarred from defending; costs orders against defendants remain in force.
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Contract, Copyright Infringement, Assessment of Damages, Debarring Orders, Case Management Sanctions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
THJ Systems Limited
Claimant
OptionNet LLP
Claimant
Daniel Sheridan
Defendant
Sheridan Options Mentoring Corporation
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Inquiry as to Damages Following Trial on Liability (chancery Division, Business List) / Assessment of Damages After Liability Judgment and Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the appropriate measure and quantum of damages for the defendants' breaches of advertising obligations under the LLP Agreement?
- 2 What is the appropriate measure and quantum of damages for copyright infringement of the Risk and Price Charts?
- 3 Should additional damages be awarded under section 97(2) CDPA due to the defendants' conduct and failure to comply with disclosure orders?
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the claimants had established, on the balance of probabilities, that the defendants' breaches of advertising obligations caused a loss of profits, and that the methodology for calculating damages, while based on assumptions, was reasonable and supported by available evidence and expert audit. The court accepted a revised, more conservative figure for loss of profits (£3,358,079.86) and found that the defendants' failure to comply with disclosure and debarring orders did not relieve the claimants of the burden of proof, but justified resolving uncertainties in the claimants' favour. The court also found that the copyright infringement was established but limited to two...
Court Disposition
Damages awarded to claimants for Advertising Breaches in the sum of £3,358,079.86; damages for copyright infringement to be assessed separately; defendants remain debarred from defending; costs orders against defendants remain in force.
Orders
- Defendants to pay claimants £3,358,079.86 for Advertising Breaches.
- Damages for copyright infringement to be assessed in accordance with the court's findings.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment