BCS Corporate Acceptances Ltd & Ors v Terry [2018] EWHC 2349 (QB) (07 September 2018)
There was no material non-disclosure or abuse of process by the Claimants in obtaining the interim third party debt order. The funds in the solicitor's client account, unless already billed and due for legal fees, remain a debt due to the Defendant and are subject to the interim third party debt order. Only sums for which proper evidence of billing and due payment is provided may be paid out to the solicitors. The source of the funds (third party funding) does not alter their status as assets of the Defendant for the purposes of enforcement at this stage.
- Citation
- [2018] EWHC 2349 (QB)
- Parties
- Claimant: BCS Corporate Acceptances Limited; Claimant: BCS Offshore Funding Limited; Claimant: Mr John Taylor; Defendant: Daniel Terry
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 September 2018
- Procedural Posture
- High Court Civil Proceedings (queen's Bench Division) / Interlocutory Application Regarding Freezing Injunction and Interim Third Party Debt Order
- Outcome
- Application dismissed in substantial part; no order for payment out at this stage; directions given for possible payment if evidence provided.
- Legal Topics
- Freezing Injunctions, Third Party Debt Orders, Solicitor's Client Account, Non Disclosure, Abuse of Process, Set Off, Access to Justice
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
BCS Corporate Acceptances Limited
Claimant
BCS Offshore Funding Limited
Claimant
Mr John Taylor
Claimant
Daniel Terry
Defendant
Procedural Posture
High Court Civil Proceedings (queen's Bench Division) / Interlocutory Application Regarding Freezing Injunction and Interim Third Party Debt Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether funds in a solicitor's client account are subject to a freezing injunction and/or third party debt order
- 2 Whether the interim third party debt order should be set aside for non-disclosure or abuse of process
- 3 Whether sums held for legal fees can be paid out despite the orders
Ratio Decidendi
There was no material non-disclosure or abuse of process by the Claimants in obtaining the interim third party debt order. The funds in the solicitor's client account, unless already billed and due for legal fees, remain a debt due to the Defendant and are subject to the interim third party debt order. Only sums for which proper evidence of billing and due payment is provided may be paid out to the solicitors. The source of the funds (third party funding) does not alter their status as assets of the Defendant for the purposes of enforcement at this stage.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed in substantial part; no order for payment out at this stage; directions given for possible payment if evidence provided.
Orders
- No order for payment out of client account at this stage.
- If Defendant provides satisfactory evidence to Claimants that bills for legal fees were rendered and due before service of the interim order, Claimants should allow payment out to solicitors, subject to court determination if disputed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment