Terry v BCS Corporate Acceptances Ltd & Ors
The court has no jurisdiction to strike out a claim after final judgment; established procedures for challenging judgments allegedly obtained by fraud are by appeal or fresh action, not by post-judgment strike out or CPR 3.1(7) application.
- Parties
- Appellant: Daniel Terry; Respondent: BCS Corporate Acceptances Limited; Respondent: BCS Offshore Funding Limited; Respondent: John Taylor
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 November 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Setting Aside Judgments, Abuse of Process, Default Judgment, Case Management Powers, Jurisdiction, Finality of Judgments
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Daniel Terry
Appellant
BCS Corporate Acceptances Limited
Respondent
BCS Offshore Funding Limited
Respondent
John Taylor
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court has jurisdiction to strike out a claim after final judgment
- 2 Whether an application to set aside judgment can be made under CPR 1 and 3, specifically CPR 3.1(7)
- 3 Whether the judge should have made directions to progress the matter rather than dismissing the applications
Ratio Decidendi
The court has no jurisdiction to strike out a claim after final judgment; established procedures for challenging judgments allegedly obtained by fraud are by appeal or fresh action, not by post-judgment strike out or CPR 3.1(7) application.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- No jurisdiction to strike out claim after final judgment
- No grounds to set aside judgment under CPR 3.1(7)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment