R v Daniel Watson
The sentence of 28 months' imprisonment was justified given the numerous aggravating factors and limited mitigation; the starting point of 3 years was not manifestly excessive even considering the lack of intent to cause harm.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Rex; Appellant: Daniel Watson
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 September 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Unlawful Wounding, Sentencing, Domestic Violence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
Rex
Prosecutor
Daniel Watson
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed for unlawful wounding was manifestly excessive
- 2 Whether the sentencing judge failed to properly consider the basis of plea regarding intent
Ratio Decidendi
The sentence of 28 months' imprisonment was justified given the numerous aggravating factors and limited mitigation; the starting point of 3 years was not manifestly excessive even considering the lack of intent to cause harm.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal against sentence refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment