Doyle, R. v

The judge's directions on consent, submission, and inconsistencies were clear, fair, and sufficient. There was no misdirection or error that rendered the conviction unsafe. The appeal is dismissed.

Parties: Appellant: Danny Doyle; Respondent: Regina (The Crown)
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
Judgment Date: 22 January 2010
Procedural Posture: Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction
Outcome: Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics: Rape, Consent, False Imprisonment, Common Assault, Criminal Damage, Jury Directions

Criminal Law Rape Consent False Imprisonment Common Assault Criminal Damage Jury Directions

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

Danny Doyle

Appellant

Regina (The Crown)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction

Legal Issues

1 Whether the trial judge failed to provide adequate directions on the issue of consent in a rape charge
2 Whether the trial judge failed to adequately address inconsistencies in the complainant's evidence
3 Whether the judge misdirected the jury regarding the appellant's interview statements

Ratio Decidendi

The judge's directions on consent, submission, and inconsistencies were clear, fair, and sufficient. There was no misdirection or error that rendered the conviction unsafe. The appeal is dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed