Mansfield v DPP [2021] EWHC 2938 (Admin) (03 November 2021)
The magistrates' court has jurisdiction to determine category 2 abuse of process applications except in a narrow class of cases involving executive misconduct in extradition. In this case, the breach of police assurance acted upon by the defendant constituted an abuse of process, and the public interest in holding officials to their promises outweighed the public interest in prosecuting the offence.
- Citation
- [2021] EWHC 2938 (Admin)
- Parties
- Appellant: Danny Mansfield; Respondent: DPP
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 November 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From District Judge's Refusal to Stay Proceedings as Abuse of Process
- Outcome
- Conviction quashed; proceedings stayed
- Legal Topics
- Abuse of Process, Jurisdiction of Magistrates' Court, Breach of Assurance, Possession of Bladed Article
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Danny Mansfield
Appellant
DPP
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From District Judge's Refusal to Stay Proceedings as Abuse of Process
Legal Issues
- 1 Does the magistrates' court have jurisdiction to determine category 2 abuse of process applications?
- 2 Was the prosecution an abuse of process due to breach of assurance by police?
Ratio Decidendi
The magistrates' court has jurisdiction to determine category 2 abuse of process applications except in a narrow class of cases involving executive misconduct in extradition. In this case, the breach of police assurance acted upon by the defendant constituted an abuse of process, and the public interest in holding officials to their promises outweighed the public interest in prosecuting the offence.
Court Disposition
Conviction quashed; proceedings stayed
Orders
- Conviction for possession of bladed article quashed
- Proceedings stayed as abuse of process
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment