R v Danson [2024] EWHC 3269 (SCCO) (16 December 2024)
Time spent by the defence advocate reviewing schedules produced by an expert from served electronic evidence, where those schedules represent a distilled and relevant body of evidence, qualifies for special preparation payment under the 2013 Regulations. The Determining Officer erred in excluding such time from the claim, as a purposive interpretation of the Regulations supports inclusion of this work.
- Citation
- [2024] EWHC 3269 (SCCO)
- Parties
- Prosecution: R; Defendant: Danson
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 December 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Costs Appeal / Appeal Under Regulation 29 of the Criminal Legal Aid (remuneration) Regulations 2013
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Special Preparation Fees, Graduated Fee Scheme, Pages of Prosecution Evidence (ppe), Electronic Evidence, Costs Assessment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
R
Prosecution
Danson
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Costs Appeal / Appeal Under Regulation 29 of the Criminal Legal Aid (remuneration) Regulations 2013
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether time spent reviewing defence expert schedules derived from served electronic evidence qualifies for special preparation payment under the 2013 Regulations
- 2 Whether the Determining Officer erred in excluding such time from the special preparation claim
Ratio Decidendi
Time spent by the defence advocate reviewing schedules produced by an expert from served electronic evidence, where those schedules represent a distilled and relevant body of evidence, qualifies for special preparation payment under the 2013 Regulations. The Determining Officer erred in excluding such time from the claim, as a purposive interpretation of the Regulations supports inclusion of this work.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- The appropriate additional payment for special preparation is to be made to the Applicant.
- An additional sum of £450 (exclusive of VAT) for costs and the £100 paid on appeal are to be paid to the Applicant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment