Darnell David Wright v Bedfordshire Youth Court & Anor
The applicant was entitled to immediate release because the statutory maximum period for post-recall detention under a Detention and Training Order had been exceeded, and no lawful basis for continued detention existed.
- Parties
- Applicant: Darnell David Wright; First Respondent: Bedfordshire Youth Court; Second Respondent: Crown Prosecution Service
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 December 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Habeas Corpus / Judgment on Application for Release
- Outcome
- Application for habeas corpus granted; order for immediate release of applicant.
- Legal Topics
- Habeas Corpus, Detention and Training Orders, Recall to Custody, Youth Offenders, Jurisdiction of Magistrates' Courts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Darnell David Wright
Applicant
Bedfordshire Youth Court
First Respondent
Crown Prosecution Service
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Habeas Corpus / Judgment on Application for Release
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant's continued detention following recall was lawful
- 2 Whether the original sentence imposed exceeded the statutory maximum for a youth court
- 3 Whether the applicant is entitled to immediate release
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant was entitled to immediate release because the statutory maximum period for post-recall detention under a Detention and Training Order had been exceeded, and no lawful basis for continued detention existed.
Court Disposition
Application for habeas corpus granted; order for immediate release of applicant.
Orders
- The applicant must be released forthwith from detention.
- The order serves as sufficient authorisation for the Governor of YOI Feltham to effect the release.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment