Horton v. Sadler & Anor

Horton v. Sadler & Anor

Permission to appeal to the House of Lords is refused because it is for their Lordships to decide whether such permission should be granted and whether the case is appropriate for the challenge described.

Parties
Claimant: Anthony Horton; Defendant: Darren Edwin Sadler; Defendant: Motor Insurers' Bureau
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
28 June 2004
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Application for Permission to Appeal to House of Lords
Outcome
application dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Appeals, Permission to Appeal, Costs
Civil Procedure Appeals Permission to Appeal Costs

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Anthony Horton

Claimant

Darren Edwin Sadler

Defendant

Motor Insurers' Bureau

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Judgment on Application for Permission to Appeal to House of Lords

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether permission should be granted to appeal to the House of Lords after dismissal of the appeal

Ratio Decidendi

Permission to appeal to the House of Lords is refused because it is for their Lordships to decide whether such permission should be granted and whether the case is appropriate for the challenge described.

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed
  • Permission to appeal to the House of Lords refused