Egan v Motor Services (Bath) Ltd

Egan v Motor Services (Bath) Ltd

The Court of Appeal held that the trial judge was entitled to find that the vehicle was not defective but merely camber sensitive, which is normal for such vehicles. The judge was justified in preferring the respondent’s evidence over the appellant’s, and the appellant failed to prove that the vehicle was out of...

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Appellant: Darren Egan; Respondent: Motor Services (Bath) Ltd
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
18 October 2007
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Sale of Goods, Satisfactory Quality, Rejection of Goods, Expert Evidence
Contract Law Consumer Protection Sale of Goods Satisfactory Quality Rejection of Goods Expert Evidence

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Darren Egan

Appellant

Motor Services (Bath) Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the vehicle supplied was of satisfactory quality under section 14 of the Sale of Goods Act 1979
  2. 2 Whether the appellant was entitled to reject the vehicle for alleged defects
  3. 3 Whether the trial judge erred in rejecting the evidence of the appellant's witness

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal held that the trial judge was entitled to find that the vehicle was not defective but merely camber sensitive, which is normal for such vehicles. The judge was justified in preferring the respondent’s evidence over the appellant’s, and the appellant failed to prove that the vehicle was out of specification at the time of rejection. Therefore, there was no breach of the implied condition of satisfactory quality, and the claim failed.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed.