Capgemini UK PLC v Dassault Systemes UK LTD

Capgemini UK PLC v Dassault Systemes UK LTD

The effect of the entire agreement clause in the Settlement Agreement is not to extinguish the PCA in its entirety but only to the extent of inconsistency with the SA. There is a properly arguable case that the PCA continues to govern substantive rights, including payment for the Go Forward Work. Dassault's arguments regarding contractual responsibility for errors in RMG data are also properly arguable. The Defendant's pleadings, while in need of clarification, do not warrant summary judgment or strike out at this stage.

Parties
Claimant: Capgemini UK PLC; Defendant: Dassault Systemes UK Ltd
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 January 2024
Procedural Posture
Commercial Contractual Dispute / Application for Summary Judgment And/or Strike Out Under CPR 24 and CPR 3.4
Outcome
Application for summary judgment and strike out dismissed, subject to direction to re-amend pleadings.
Legal Topics
Entire Agreement Clauses, Contractual Construction, Implied Terms, Summary Judgment, Strike Out Applications, Risk Allocation, Limitation of Liability
Contract Law Commercial Law Entire Agreement Clauses Contractual Construction Implied Terms Summary Judgment Strike Out Applications Risk Allocation +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 21 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Capgemini UK PLC

Claimant

Dassault Systemes UK Ltd

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial Contractual Dispute / Application for Summary Judgment And/or Strike Out Under CPR 24 and CPR 3.4

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the entire agreement clause in the Settlement Agreement extinguishes the Prime Contractor Agreement (PCA) and precludes reliance on its terms
  2. 2 Whether, as a matter of construction or implied term, Capgemini is contractually responsible for errors in data provided by Royal Mail Group (RMG)
  3. 3 Whether the Defendant's pleadings adequately set out the contractual basis for its reliance on errors in RMG data

Ratio Decidendi

The effect of the entire agreement clause in the Settlement Agreement is not to extinguish the PCA in its entirety but only to the extent of inconsistency with the SA. There is a properly arguable case that the PCA continues to govern substantive rights, including payment for the Go Forward Work. Dassault's arguments regarding contractual responsibility for errors in RMG data are also properly arguable. The Defendant's pleadings, while in need of clarification, do not warrant summary judgment or strike out at this stage.

Court Disposition

Application for summary judgment and strike out dismissed, subject to direction to re-amend pleadings.

Orders

  • Defendant to re-amend the Amended Defence and Counterclaim to clarify the contractual basis for its reliance on errors in RMG data, identifying specific contractual language relied upon.
  • Application for summary judgment and strike out by Claimant dismissed.