Daventry District Council v Daventry & District Housing Ltd
The claim for rectification failed because the parties' common intention did not continue until execution of the Transfer Contract; the contract unambiguously provided for DDC to pay the pension deficit. The claim for unilateral mistake failed as DDH did not know DDC was still mistaken at execution. No duty of care arose between the parties in the negotiation context.
- Parties
- Claimant: Daventry District Council; Defendant: Daventry & District Housing Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 July 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Rectification, Mistake, Duty of Care, Large Scale Voluntary Transfer, Pension Deficit
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Daventry District Council
Claimant
Daventry & District Housing Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Was there ever a common intention that DDH would pay £2.4 million to NCC in respect of the pension deficit?
- 2 Did that common intention continue until execution of the Transfer Contract?
- 3 Would rectification of clause 14.10.3 alone result in the Transfer Contract reflecting the true agreement between the parties?
Ratio Decidendi
The claim for rectification failed because the parties' common intention did not continue until execution of the Transfer Contract; the contract unambiguously provided for DDC to pay the pension deficit. The claim for unilateral mistake failed as DDH did not know DDC was still mistaken at execution. No duty of care arose between the parties in the negotiation context.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment