Atkinson, R. v [2009] EWCA Crim 1334 (09 June 2009)
The original sentence of 12 years' imprisonment was excessive and not in line with established sentencing guidelines for frauds of similar scale; a total sentence of 6 years' imprisonment, reflecting the appellant's guilty plea and the totality principle, was appropriate.
- Citation
- [2009] EWCA Crim 1334
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Appellant: David Anthony Atkinson
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 June 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Fraud, Sentencing, Money Transfer by Deception, Fraudulent Trading, Theft
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
David Anthony Atkinson
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed was excessive for the offences committed
- 2 Appropriate sentencing guidelines for large-scale fraud and related offences
Ratio Decidendi
The original sentence of 12 years' imprisonment was excessive and not in line with established sentencing guidelines for frauds of similar scale; a total sentence of 6 years' imprisonment, reflecting the appellant's guilty plea and the totality principle, was appropriate.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Sentences on indictment T20080455 quashed and substituted with 12 months' imprisonment.
- Sentences on indictment T20080456 counts 1-4 quashed and substituted with 3 years' imprisonment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment