Arthur v Ofsted [2006] EWCST 685(EY) (19 May 2006)
The appeal was not out of time because, although the deadline fell on a Saturday, the earliest the appeal could have been processed was the following Monday, when it was in fact received. The application to strike out for lack of prospect of success was premature as the appellant had not yet been required to provide...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2006] EWCST 685
- Parties
- Appellant: David Arthur; Respondent: OFSTED
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 May 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Application to Strike Out Appeal
- Outcome
- application to strike out dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Appeal Deadlines, Strike Out Applications, Care Standards Regulation
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David Arthur
Appellant
OFSTED
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Application to Strike Out Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appeal was filed within the statutory time limit
- 2 Whether the appeal is misconceived and has no prospect of success
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was not out of time because, although the deadline fell on a Saturday, the earliest the appeal could have been processed was the following Monday, when it was in fact received. The application to strike out for lack of prospect of success was premature as the appellant had not yet been required to provide further information or amend his grounds.
Court Disposition
application to strike out dismissed
Orders
- The application to strike out the appeal pursuant to Regulation 4A(1)(a)(i) is dismissed.
- The application to strike out the appeal pursuant to Regulation 4A(1)(b) is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment