North Warwickshire Borough Council v Baldwin & Ors [2023] EWHC 1719 (KB) (14 July 2023)
The Council was entitled to interim injunctive relief to restrain protest activities at Kingsbury Oil Terminal that created serious risks to public safety and constituted public nuisance. The injunction terms, as amended to remove the buffer zone, were proportionate and struck a fair balance between the rights of protestors and the need to protect the public. The Council had standing under s.222 Local Government Act 1972 and s.130 Highways Act 1980. The definition of 'persons unknown' was sufficiently precise, and alternative service was justified. The injunction did not unlawfully interfere with Articles 10 and 11 ECHR rights.
- Citation
- [2023] EWHC 1719 (KB)
- Parties
- Claimant: North Warwickshire Borough Council; Defendant: David Baldwin; Defendant: Thomas Barber; Defendant: Michelle Cadet-Rose; Defendant: Tim Hewes; Defendant: John Howlett; Defendant: John Jordan; Defendant: Carmen Lean; Defendant: Alison Lee; Defendant: Amy Pritchard; Defendant: Stephen Pritchard; Defendant: Paul Raithby; Defendant: Holly Rothwell; Defendant: John Smith; Defendant: Ben Taylor; Defendant: Jane Thewlis; Defendant: Anthony Whitehouse; Defendant: Persons Unknown; Defendant: Jake Handling; Interested Person: Jessica Branch
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 July 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Interim Injunction Application (civil) / Return Date Hearing on Continuation of Interim Injunction
- Outcome
- Interim injunction continued (as amended) until trial; applications to discharge refused.
- Legal Topics
- Interim Injunctions, Protest Law, Public Nuisance, Power of Arrest, Alternative Service, Articles 10 and 11 ECHR, Persons Unknown, Local Authority Powers
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
North Warwickshire Borough Council
Claimant
David Baldwin
Defendant
Thomas Barber
Defendant
Michelle Cadet-Rose
Defendant
Tim Hewes
Defendant
John Howlett
Defendant
John Jordan
Defendant
Carmen Lean
Defendant
Alison Lee
Defendant
Amy Pritchard
Defendant
Stephen Pritchard
Defendant
Paul Raithby
Defendant
Holly Rothwell
Defendant
John Smith
Defendant
Ben Taylor
Defendant
Jane Thewlis
Defendant
Anthony Whitehouse
Defendant
Persons Unknown
Defendant
Jake Handling
Defendant
Jessica Branch
Interested Person
Procedural Posture
Interim Injunction Application (civil) / Return Date Hearing on Continuation of Interim Injunction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Council is entitled to interim injunctive relief against protestors (named and persons unknown) at Kingsbury Oil Terminal
- 2 Whether the injunction terms, including buffer zone and power of arrest, are proportionate and lawful
- 3 Whether the definition of 'persons unknown' is sufficiently precise
Ratio Decidendi
The Council was entitled to interim injunctive relief to restrain protest activities at Kingsbury Oil Terminal that created serious risks to public safety and constituted public nuisance. The injunction terms, as amended to remove the buffer zone, were proportionate and struck a fair balance between the rights of protestors and the need to protect the public. The Council had standing under s.222 Local Government Act 1972 and s.130 Highways Act 1980. The definition of 'persons unknown' was sufficiently precise, and alternative service was justified. The injunction did not unlawfully interfere with Articles 10 and 11 ECHR rights.
Court Disposition
Interim injunction continued (as amended) until trial; applications to discharge refused.
Orders
- Continuation of interim injunction against named defendants and persons unknown, with amended terms removing the buffer zone.
- Power of arrest attached to specified prohibitions.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment