Gary Pickett v David Balkind
Privilege in the expert's letter was waived by deliberate deployment in support of an application; mistake was not obvious to recipient. No injunction restraining use. Comments/aide memoire not ordered for production as not shown to be material instructions, but cross-examination of expert on independence permitted. Prior Associates report must be produced as privilege was waived by reliance in expert report.
- Parties
- Claimant: Gary Pickett; Defendant: David Balkind
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 August 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory Applications Prior to Trial
- Outcome
- Applications for injunction and production of aide memoire/comments refused; permission to cross-examine expert granted; order for production of Prior Associates report granted.
- Legal Topics
- Privilege Waiver, Expert Evidence, Disclosure, Injunctions, Case Management
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gary Pickett
Claimant
David Balkind
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Applications Prior to Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether privilege in an expert's letter was waived by inadvertent disclosure
- 2 Whether an injunction should restrain use of the letter
- 3 Whether instructions/comments to expert must be disclosed
Ratio Decidendi
Privilege in the expert's letter was waived by deliberate deployment in support of an application; mistake was not obvious to recipient. No injunction restraining use. Comments/aide memoire not ordered for production as not shown to be material instructions, but cross-examination of expert on independence permitted. Prior Associates report must be produced as privilege was waived by reliance in expert report.
Court Disposition
Applications for injunction and production of aide memoire/comments refused; permission to cross-examine expert granted; order for production of Prior Associates report granted.
Orders
- Claimant's application for injunction refused.
- Defendant permitted to deploy expert's letter in evidence.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment