David Barton v The Information Commissioner & Anor
The Council failed to demonstrate any specific or probable harm from disclosure of the requested profit and loss accounts, and thus could not rely on regulation 12(5)(e) or 12(5)(f) EIR to withhold the information. The public interest in disclosure was not outweighed by any identified adverse effect or legitimate economic interest.
- Parties
- Appellant: David Barton; First Respondent: The Information Commissioner; Second Respondent: Wigan Metropolitan Borough Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Environmental Information Regulations, Freedom of Information, Planning Applications, Confidentiality, Public Interest Test
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David Barton
Appellant
The Information Commissioner
First Respondent
Wigan Metropolitan Borough Council
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Wigan Metropolitan Borough Council was entitled to rely on regulation 12(5)(e) or 12(5)(f) of the Environmental Information Regulations 2004 to withhold requested information
- 2 Whether disclosure of the profit and loss accounts would adversely affect the interests of the information provider
- 3 Whether the public interest in maintaining confidentiality outweighs the public interest in disclosure
Ratio Decidendi
The Council failed to demonstrate any specific or probable harm from disclosure of the requested profit and loss accounts, and thus could not rely on regulation 12(5)(e) or 12(5)(f) EIR to withhold the information. The public interest in disclosure was not outweighed by any identified adverse effect or legitimate economic interest.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Wigan Metropolitan Borough Council must disclose the withheld information to the appellant within 35 days of the date of this decision.
- Any failure to comply may amount to contempt and may be certified to the Upper Tribunal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment