R v David Chorlton
The sentence of 10 years' imprisonment was manifestly excessive given the aggravating features; a sentence of 8½ years' imprisonment was appropriate after credit for guilty plea. The conviction on count 2 was quashed as duplicitous. The procedural irregularity in committal for sentence of summary offences did not invalidate the sentencing.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Appellant: David Chorlton
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 May 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Causing Death by Dangerous Driving, Driving Whilst Disqualified, Driving Without Insurance, Sentencing Guidelines, Procedural Irregularities
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
David Chorlton
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence of 10 years' imprisonment for causing death by dangerous driving was manifestly excessive
- 2 Appropriate classification of the offence under sentencing guidelines
- 3 Validity of conviction on count 2 (causing death by dangerous driving whilst unlicensed, uninsured, or disqualified)
Ratio Decidendi
The sentence of 10 years' imprisonment was manifestly excessive given the aggravating features; a sentence of 8½ years' imprisonment was appropriate after credit for guilty plea. The conviction on count 2 was quashed as duplicitous. The procedural irregularity in committal for sentence of summary offences did not invalidate the sentencing.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Sentence of 10 years' imprisonment substituted with 8½ years' imprisonment for causing death by dangerous driving.
- Conviction on count 2 quashed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment