Celebrity Speakers Limited v David Daniel & Ors

Celebrity Speakers Limited v David Daniel & Ors

CSL established loss of commission from diverted bookings of Mr Dickinson due to Defendants' breach of contract and duty, supported by evidence and admissions in pleadings. Negotiating damages for interference with confidential database were appropriate given the asset's value and Defendants' conduct. Injunctions were justified to restrain further misuse, as damages and injunctions address distinct harms. Interest awarded to compensate for delay in payment.

Parties
Claimant: Celebrity Speakers Limited; Defendant: David Daniel; Defendant: Andrew Leighton-Pope; Defendant: D&A Associates Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 September 2024
Procedural Posture
Civil / Remedies Hearing After Judgment on Liability
Outcome
Judgment for Claimant on remedies; injunctions granted; damages and interest awarded.
Legal Topics
Breach of Contract, Restrictive Covenants, Confidential Information, Conspiracy, Negligence, Remedies, Damages, Injunctions
Contract Law Tort Law Equity Employment Law Breach of Contract Restrictive Covenants Confidential Information Conspiracy +4 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Celebrity Speakers Limited

Claimant

David Daniel

Defendant

Andrew Leighton-Pope

Defendant

D&A Associates Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Remedies Hearing After Judgment on Liability

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Factual basis for remedies after strike out and judgment
  2. 2 Limitation of damages to claim form amount
  3. 3 Definition and application of 'Restricted Client'

Ratio Decidendi

CSL established loss of commission from diverted bookings of Mr Dickinson due to Defendants' breach of contract and duty, supported by evidence and admissions in pleadings. Negotiating damages for interference with confidential database were appropriate given the asset's value and Defendants' conduct. Injunctions were justified to restrain further misuse, as damages and injunctions address distinct harms. Interest awarded to compensate for delay in payment.

Court Disposition

Judgment for Claimant on remedies; injunctions granted; damages and interest awarded.

Orders

  • Defendants restrained from copying, disclosing, or using CSL's confidential information and database.
  • Defendants required to deliver up all electronic and hard copies of CSL's confidential information and database in their custody or control.