HRH Prince Fahad Bin Sultan Al Saud & Anor v David Eden & Anor
The application for interim relief was refused because there was no evidence of a real risk of damage by the receivers, damages would be an adequate remedy if any loss occurred, and privacy concerns did not justify an injunction in the context of enforcement of security following default.
- Parties
- Claimant: HRH Prince Fahad Bin Sultan Al Saud; Claimant: Premium Big Continental Inc.; Defendant: David Eden; Defendant: Geoffrey Wayne Bouchier
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 January 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Application for Urgent Interim Relief
- Outcome
- application refused
- Legal Topics
- Receivership, Interim Injunctions, Adequacy of Damages, Privacy Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
HRH Prince Fahad Bin Sultan Al Saud
Claimant
Premium Big Continental Inc.
Claimant
David Eden
Defendant
Geoffrey Wayne Bouchier
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Application for Urgent Interim Relief
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether interim relief should be granted to restrain receivers from entering and dealing with the property.
- 2 Whether damages are an adequate remedy for the claimants.
- 3 Whether privacy concerns justify the grant of an injunction.
Ratio Decidendi
The application for interim relief was refused because there was no evidence of a real risk of damage by the receivers, damages would be an adequate remedy if any loss occurred, and privacy concerns did not justify an injunction in the context of enforcement of security following default.
Court Disposition
application refused
Orders
- Application for interim relief is refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment