Diana Neslen & Ors v David Evans

Diana Neslen & Ors v David Evans

The Labour Party's use of the unpublished 2018 Code did not result in actual unfairness to the claimants, as they had sufficient notice and opportunity to make meaningful representations; the Party's acceptance of EHRC recommendations did not render ongoing investigations unfair or require immediate cessation; and the confidentiality requests in Notices did not breach contract or fairness, nor cause actual unfairness.

Parties
Claimant: Diana Neslen; Claimant: Michael Ellman; Claimant: Michael Howard; Claimant: Jonathan Rosenhead; Claimant: Chris Wallis; Claimant: John Davies; Claimant: Colin O’Driscoll; Claimant: Alma Yaniv; Claimant: Sameh Habeeb; Defendant: David Evans
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
08 July 2021
Procedural Posture
Part 8 Claim / Final Judgment
Outcome
Claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Procedural Fairness, Natural Justice, Disciplinary Proceedings, Party Rules, Anti Semitism Investigations
Contract Law Administrative Law Human Rights Procedural Fairness Natural Justice Disciplinary Proceedings Party Rules Anti Semitism Investigations

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Diana Neslen

Claimant

Michael Ellman

Claimant

Michael Howard

Claimant

Jonathan Rosenhead

Claimant

Chris Wallis

Claimant

John Davies

Claimant

Colin O’Driscoll

Claimant

Alma Yaniv

Claimant

Sameh Habeeb

Claimant

David Evans

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Part 8 Claim / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Labour Party's use of an unpublished Code of Conduct breached procedural fairness and contract
  2. 2 Whether ongoing investigations under the current disciplinary system are unfair given the Party's acceptance of EHRC recommendations
  3. 3 Whether the Party mis-stated members' obligations of confidentiality in Notices of Investigation

Ratio Decidendi

The Labour Party's use of the unpublished 2018 Code did not result in actual unfairness to the claimants, as they had sufficient notice and opportunity to make meaningful representations; the Party's acceptance of EHRC recommendations did not render ongoing investigations unfair or require immediate cessation; and the confidentiality requests in Notices did not breach contract or fairness, nor cause actual unfairness.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed