Frost v Oldfield

Frost v Oldfield

The court found, on the balance of probabilities and based on factual and expert evidence, that the collision occurred in the Macclesfield-bound lane, and Mr Oldfield was wholly responsible for the accident due to his negligence in entering the wrong lane at excessive speed.

Parties
Claimant: Trevor Frost; Defendant: David Frank Oldfield
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
18 February 2010
Procedural Posture
Civil Negligence (road Traffic Accident) / Judgment on Liability
Outcome
Judgment for Mr Frost on his claim; Mr Oldfield's claim dismissed.
Legal Topics
Negligence, Road Traffic Accident, Liability, Expert Evidence
Tort Law Civil Procedure Negligence Road Traffic Accident Liability Expert Evidence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Trevor Frost

Claimant

David Frank Oldfield

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Negligence (road Traffic Accident) / Judgment on Liability

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Which party was in the wrong lane at the time of collision?
  2. 2 Who was liable for the road traffic accident?
  3. 3 Was there contributory negligence or sole responsibility?

Ratio Decidendi

The court found, on the balance of probabilities and based on factual and expert evidence, that the collision occurred in the Macclesfield-bound lane, and Mr Oldfield was wholly responsible for the accident due to his negligence in entering the wrong lane at excessive speed.

Court Disposition

Judgment for Mr Frost on his claim; Mr Oldfield's claim dismissed.

Orders

  • Judgment for Mr Frost on liability.
  • Mr Oldfield's claim dismissed.