Jenkins & Ors, R v [2002] EWCA Crim 749 (14th February, 2002)
The trial judge's directions on provocation and secondary liability were proper and sufficient, the evidence was admissible, and the 'Steps to Verdict' document was clear and accurate; no misdirection or irregularity rendered the convictions unsafe.
- Citation
- [2002] EWCA Crim 749
- Parties
- Prosecution: R; Appellant: David Ian Jenkins; Appellant: Alicia Jenkins; Appellant: Terry William Jenkins; Appellant: Russell Brown
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Renewed Applications for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- applications for leave to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Joint Enterprise, Secondary Liability, Provocation, Admissibility of Evidence, Jury Directions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
R
Prosecution
David Ian Jenkins
Appellant
Alicia Jenkins
Appellant
Terry William Jenkins
Appellant
Russell Brown
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Applications for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge misdirected the jury on provocation and secondary liability for murder
- 2 Whether post-mortem photographs were wrongly admitted into evidence
- 3 Whether there was a case to answer for Alicia Jenkins as a secondary party
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge's directions on provocation and secondary liability were proper and sufficient, the evidence was admissible, and the 'Steps to Verdict' document was clear and accurate; no misdirection or irregularity rendered the convictions unsafe.
Court Disposition
applications for leave to appeal refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment