Jenkins, R v
The sentence imposed was not manifestly excessive; the judge was entitled to adopt a starting point of six years before credit for plea, and personal mitigation did not justify a reduction outside the sentencing guidelines.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Regina; Appellant: David Jenkins
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 September 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Offences, Sentencing, Child Protection, Appeal Against Sentence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Parties
Regina
Prosecutor
David Jenkins
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive
- 2 Whether the starting point for sentencing was too high
- 3 Whether sufficient account was taken of personal mitigation
Ratio Decidendi
The sentence imposed was not manifestly excessive; the judge was entitled to adopt a starting point of six years before credit for plea, and personal mitigation did not justify a reduction outside the sentencing guidelines.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Sentence of four years' imprisonment upheld
- Sexual Harm Prevention Order remains in force
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment