Abberley & Ors v Abberley
The heads of terms signed at mediation constituted a binding contract as all essential terms were agreed with sufficient certainty, and the document complied with statutory requirements for disposition of land. Subsequent attempts to formalise the agreement did not negate its binding nature.
- Parties
- Claimant: John Thomas Abberley; Claimant: Eileen Abberley; Claimant: Mark Thomas Abberley; Defendant: David John Abberley
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 June 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment
- Outcome
- Declaration granted; agreement enforceable.
- Legal Topics
- Certainty of Contract, Enforceability of Mediation Agreements, Statutory Requirements for Land Disposition, Family Farming Partnership Dispute
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Thomas Abberley
Claimant
Eileen Abberley
Claimant
Mark Thomas Abberley
Claimant
David John Abberley
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the heads of terms signed at mediation constituted a binding contract
- 2 Whether the heads of terms are sufficiently certain to be enforceable
- 3 Whether the heads of terms comply with section 2 of the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989
Ratio Decidendi
The heads of terms signed at mediation constituted a binding contract as all essential terms were agreed with sufficient certainty, and the document complied with statutory requirements for disposition of land. Subsequent attempts to formalise the agreement did not negate its binding nature.
Court Disposition
Declaration granted; agreement enforceable.
Orders
- Claimants entitled to declaration that heads of terms constitute a binding contract and enforcement of the agreement.
- Counsel invited to agree form of order or make written submissions within 14 days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment