Barker v Fuller [2001] EWCA Civ 379 (7 March 2001)

Barker v Fuller [2001] EWCA Civ 379 (7 March 2001)

Permission to appeal was granted because the trial judge's reasoning was insufficiently explained, particularly in relation to the Mercedes transaction and the rejection of third-party evidence, raising an arguable complaint about the adequacy of judicial reasoning.

Citation
[2001] EWCA Civ 379
Parties
Claimant: Anthony Barker; Defendant: David John Fuller
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
07 March 2001
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal
Outcome
Permission to appeal granted; extension of time granted; costs in the appeal.
Legal Topics
Conversion, Judicial Reasoning, Appeals
Civil Procedure Tort Conversion Judicial Reasoning Appeals

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Anthony Barker

Claimant

David John Fuller

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge failed to provide sufficient reasons for his decision.
  2. 2 Whether the evidence regarding the Mercedes transaction was properly considered.
  3. 3 Whether the judge adequately addressed the credibility of third-party witnesses and documentary evidence.

Ratio Decidendi

Permission to appeal was granted because the trial judge's reasoning was insufficiently explained, particularly in relation to the Mercedes transaction and the rejection of third-party evidence, raising an arguable complaint about the adequacy of judicial reasoning.

Court Disposition

Permission to appeal granted; extension of time granted; costs in the appeal.

Orders

  • Permission to appeal granted.
  • Extension of time granted.