Mitchell, R. v [2023] EWCA Crim 424 (21 April 2023)
There are no arguable grounds that the applicant's guilty pleas were other than voluntary and informed, nor that he was deprived of a defence which would probably have succeeded, nor that the convictions are unsafe. The application for extension of time is dismissed as there is no prospect of success.
- Citation
- [2023] EWCA Crim 424
- Parties
- Applicant: David John Mitchell (aka David John); Respondent: The King
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 April 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Extension of Time to Apply for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Leave to Appeal, Guilty Plea, Joint Enterprise, Possession With Intent to Supply, Dangerous Driving, Admissibility of Evidence, Legal Representation, Mitigation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David John Mitchell (aka David John)
Applicant
The King
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Extension of Time to Apply for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant's guilty pleas were voluntary and informed
- 2 Whether legal representation was negligent or defective
- 3 Whether fingerprint and telephone evidence was misrepresented or inadmissible
Ratio Decidendi
There are no arguable grounds that the applicant's guilty pleas were other than voluntary and informed, nor that he was deprived of a defence which would probably have succeeded, nor that the convictions are unsafe. The application for extension of time is dismissed as there is no prospect of success.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Renewed application for extension of time to apply for leave to appeal against conviction is refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment