Joseph v Deloitte NSE LLP (Rev 1)

Joseph v Deloitte NSE LLP (Rev 1)

The express terms of clause 16.2(b) of the LLP Agreement provide a strict seven-day deadline from the date of the Board meeting for demanding a partners’ meeting, and no implied term or estoppel can override this express provision. The appellant’s request was out of time and the appeal is dismissed.

Parties
Appellant: David Joseph; Respondent: Deloitte NSE LLP
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
05 November 2020
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Implied Terms, Estoppel, Interpretation of Partnership Agreements, Specific Performance, Breach of Contract
Contract Law Partnership Law Implied Terms Estoppel Interpretation of Partnership Agreements Specific Performance Breach of Contract

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

David Joseph

Appellant

Deloitte NSE LLP

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether clause 16.2 of the LLP Agreement contains an implied term extending the time for demanding a partners’ meeting until after communication of the Board’s decision
  2. 2 Whether Deloitte was estopped from denying the timeliness of the request for a partners’ meeting

Ratio Decidendi

The express terms of clause 16.2(b) of the LLP Agreement provide a strict seven-day deadline from the date of the Board meeting for demanding a partners’ meeting, and no implied term or estoppel can override this express provision. The appellant’s request was out of time and the appeal is dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed