David King v The Information Commissioner
The Tribunal lacks jurisdiction to consider the substantive outcome or conduct of the Commissioner’s investigation under section 166 DPA 2018, as the Commissioner provided procedural outcomes within the statutory timeframe and the Applicant’s challenge concerns the merits and conduct, not procedural failings. There is no reasonable prospect of the appeal succeeding.
- Parties
- Applicant: David King; Respondent: The Information Commissioner
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 July 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Information Rights Appeal / Application for Order Under Section 166(2) DPA 2018; Striking Out Decision
- Outcome
- Application struck out
- Legal Topics
- Section 166 Data Protection Act 2018, Tribunal Jurisdiction, Procedural Rights, Information Commissioner's Powers
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David King
Applicant
The Information Commissioner
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Information Rights Appeal / Application for Order Under Section 166(2) DPA 2018; Striking Out Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tribunal has jurisdiction under section 166(2) DPA 2018 to grant the remedies sought by the Applicant
- 2 Whether the Commissioner failed to comply with procedural requirements under section 166(1) DPA 2018
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal lacks jurisdiction to consider the substantive outcome or conduct of the Commissioner’s investigation under section 166 DPA 2018, as the Commissioner provided procedural outcomes within the statutory timeframe and the Applicant’s challenge concerns the merits and conduct, not procedural failings. There is no reasonable prospect of the appeal succeeding.
Court Disposition
Application struck out
Orders
- The application is struck out under Rule 8(3)(c) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal)(General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2009.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment