Martin v Fujitsu Services (Engineering Services) Ltd

Martin v Fujitsu Services (Engineering Services) Ltd

The dismissal order is set aside only if the applicant files a fully compliant bundle, including a skeleton argument and index, by 4.00 pm on the day of the hearing; otherwise, the dismissal order stands.

Parties
Applicant: David Martin; Respondent: Fujitsu Services (Engineering Services) Ltd
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
18 March 2016
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Reconsideration of Dismissal Order
Outcome
conditional setting aside of dismissal order
Legal Topics
Appeal, Extension of Time, Compliance With Court Directions
Civil Procedure Appeal Extension of Time Compliance With Court Directions

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

David Martin

Applicant

Fujitsu Services (Engineering Services) Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Reconsideration of Dismissal Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 whether the dismissal order for failure to comply with Practice Direction 52C should be set aside

Ratio Decidendi

The dismissal order is set aside only if the applicant files a fully compliant bundle, including a skeleton argument and index, by 4.00 pm on the day of the hearing; otherwise, the dismissal order stands.

Court Disposition

conditional setting aside of dismissal order

Orders

  • Dismissal order set aside if compliant bundle filed by 4.00 pm today; otherwise, dismissal order stands.