Clements (Liquidator of HHO Licensing Ltd) v Henry Hadaway Organisation Ltd

Clements (Liquidator of HHO Licensing Ltd) v Henry Hadaway Organisation Ltd

The court found that the management charges imposed by Organisation on the Company were not justified by the value of services provided, were based on suspect calculations, and were appropriated without proper consideration or independent advice. The payments constituted both transactions at an undervalue and...

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Applicant: David Michael Clements; Respondent: Henry Hadaway Organisation Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
10 October 2007
Procedural Posture
Company Liquidation Application / Judgment
Outcome
Liquidator's application granted
Legal Topics
Transactions at an Undervalue, Preferences, Connected Companies, Liquidator's Powers
Insolvency Company Law Transactions at an Undervalue Preferences Connected Companies Liquidator's Powers

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

David Michael Clements

Applicant

Henry Hadaway Organisation Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Company Liquidation Application / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether payments by HHO Licensing Limited to Henry Hadaway Organisation Limited were transactions at an undervalue under section 238 of the Insolvency Act 1986
  2. 2 Whether payments constituted preferences under section 239 of the Insolvency Act 1986
  3. 3 Whether the company acted in good faith and with reasonable grounds for believing the transactions would benefit the company

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the management charges imposed by Organisation on the Company were not justified by the value of services provided, were based on suspect calculations, and were appropriated without proper consideration or independent advice. The payments constituted both transactions at an undervalue and preferences to a connected company, with no good faith or reasonable grounds for benefit, and the presumption of desire to prefer was not rebutted.

Court Disposition

Liquidator's application granted

Orders

  • Declarations and orders sought by the Liquidator are made; Counsel to agree a Minute of Order