Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Gee & Anor
Both Mr Smedley and Mr Gee were found to have orchestrated, participated in, or knowingly permitted substantial fraud against GE Commercial Finance Ltd and deliberate non-payment of Crown debts, rendering them unfit to be concerned in the management of a company under section 6 of the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986.
- Parties
- Claimant: THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR TRADE AND INDUSTRY; Defendant: DAVID NEASHAM GEE; Defendant: KEVIN SMEDLEY
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 February 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 / Judgment
- Outcome
- Disqualification order granted against both defendants.
- Legal Topics
- Director Disqualification, Fraud, Misrepresentation, Non Payment of Crown Debts, Company Management, Financial Reporting
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR TRADE AND INDUSTRY
Claimant
DAVID NEASHAM GEE
Defendant
KEVIN SMEDLEY
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application Under Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether David Neasham Gee and Kevin Smedley should be disqualified from acting as directors under the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 due to fraud and non-payment of Crown debts
Ratio Decidendi
Both Mr Smedley and Mr Gee were found to have orchestrated, participated in, or knowingly permitted substantial fraud against GE Commercial Finance Ltd and deliberate non-payment of Crown debts, rendering them unfit to be concerned in the management of a company under section 6 of the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986.
Court Disposition
Disqualification order granted against both defendants.
Orders
- Kevin Smedley disqualified from acting as director for 12 years.
- David Neasham Gee disqualified from acting as director for 12 years.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment