North Warwickshire Borough Council v Nixon & Anor [2022] EWHC 1517 (QB) (11 May 2022)
The defendants admitted three breaches of an interim injunction prohibiting protest within a defined buffer zone at Kingsbury Oil Terminal. The most serious breach occurred on 4 May 2022, while the defendants were on bail and failed to attend court, constituting a persistent and deliberate violation. The court applied criminal sentencing guidelines by analogy, determined the appropriate penalty for the lead breach would have been 28 days' imprisonment, reduced to 18 days for admissions. As the defendants had already served 18 days in custody on remand, no further order was made.
- Citation
- [2022] EWHC 1517 (QB)
- Parties
- Claimant: North Warwickshire Borough Council; Defendant: David Nixon; Defendant: Margaret Reid
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 May 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Contempt of Court (civil Injunction Breach) / Sentencing/final Judgment
- Outcome
- No further order; defendants deemed to have served sentence by time on remand.
- Legal Topics
- Contempt of Court, Interim Injunctions, Protest Law, Sentencing for Civil Contempt
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
North Warwickshire Borough Council
Claimant
David Nixon
Defendant
Margaret Reid
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Contempt of Court (civil Injunction Breach) / Sentencing/final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendants breached the terms of the interim injunction order
- 2 Appropriate penalty for admitted breaches of a civil injunction
Ratio Decidendi
The defendants admitted three breaches of an interim injunction prohibiting protest within a defined buffer zone at Kingsbury Oil Terminal. The most serious breach occurred on 4 May 2022, while the defendants were on bail and failed to attend court, constituting a persistent and deliberate violation. The court applied criminal sentencing guidelines by analogy, determined the appropriate penalty for the lead breach would have been 28 days' imprisonment, reduced to 18 days for admissions. As the defendants had already served 18 days in custody on remand, no further order was made.
Court Disposition
No further order; defendants deemed to have served sentence by time on remand.
Orders
- Record that each defendant has served the equivalent of an 18-day custodial sentence for contempt.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment