David Pegg v The Information Commissioner & Anor
The disclosure of the requested aggregated security cost would reasonably likely increase the confidence of hostile actors, thereby increasing the risk of attacks on national security; the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosure.
- Parties
- Appellant: David Pegg; First Respondent: The Information Commissioner; Second Respondent: The Home Office
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 November 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Freedom of Information Act, National Security Exemption, Public Interest Test, Disclosure of Public Expenditure, Mosaic Effect
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David Pegg
Appellant
The Information Commissioner
First Respondent
The Home Office
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Home Office correctly applied the public interest test under section 24(1) FOIA
- 2 Whether disclosure of aggregated royal security costs would increase risk to national security
- 3 Whether the mosaic effect and increased confidence of hostile actors justify withholding information
Ratio Decidendi
The disclosure of the requested aggregated security cost would reasonably likely increase the confidence of hostile actors, thereby increasing the risk of attacks on national security; the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosure.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The decision to refuse disclosure of the requested information under section 24(1) FOIA is confirmed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment