Farmbrough, R. v

Farmbrough, R. v

The Court found that the trial judge did not err in admitting the bad character and hearsay evidence, as the statutory requirements were satisfied and the judge considered all relevant circumstances. The jury direction was adequate, and the inclusion of the evidence did not render the verdict unsafe.

Parties
Prosecution: Regina; Applicant: David Peter Farmbrough
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
13 November 2009
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Bad Character Evidence, Hearsay Evidence, Jury Directions, Murder Conviction, Admissibility of Evidence
Criminal Law Bad Character Evidence Hearsay Evidence Jury Directions Murder Conviction Admissibility of Evidence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Prosecution

David Peter Farmbrough

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge erred in admitting bad character and hearsay evidence under the Criminal Justice Act 2003 and Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984
  2. 2 Whether the jury direction regarding bad character evidence was flawed
  3. 3 Whether the inclusion of bad character/hearsay evidence rendered the verdict unsafe

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found that the trial judge did not err in admitting the bad character and hearsay evidence, as the statutory requirements were satisfied and the judge considered all relevant circumstances. The jury direction was adequate, and the inclusion of the evidence did not render the verdict unsafe.

Court Disposition

application dismissed