Matthews, R v [2009] EWCA Crim 1450 (25 June 2009)
The sentence of three years' imprisonment was not manifestly excessive given the seriousness of the underlying offence (manslaughter), the persistent and deliberate nature of the applicant's conduct, and the significant impact on the course of justice. The sentencing judge properly considered all relevant factors and there was no error in approach.
- Citation
- [2009] EWCA Crim 1450
- Parties
- Respondent: Regina; Applicant: David Peter Matthews
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 June 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- application for permission to appeal against sentence refused
- Legal Topics
- Perverting the Course of Justice, Sentencing, Mitigation, Health and Safety Offences, Manslaughter
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Respondent
David Peter Matthews
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence of three years' imprisonment for perverting the course of justice was manifestly excessive
- 2 Whether the sentencing judge gave adequate weight to mitigating factors
Ratio Decidendi
The sentence of three years' imprisonment was not manifestly excessive given the seriousness of the underlying offence (manslaughter), the persistent and deliberate nature of the applicant's conduct, and the significant impact on the course of justice. The sentencing judge properly considered all relevant factors and there was no error in approach.
Court Disposition
application for permission to appeal against sentence refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment