The Official Receiver v Arron (Costs) [2021] EWHC 1775 (Ch) (29 June 2021)
The claimant, as the successful party, is entitled to its costs, and there is no good reason to depart from the general rule. A payment on account of £15,000 is reasonable, representing a greater margin for assessment uncertainty than the claimant's request.
- Citation
- [2021] EWHC 1775 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: The Official Receiver; Defendant: David Philip Arron
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 29 June 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Company Directors Disqualification / Judgment on Costs Following Substantive Judgment
- Outcome
- Costs awarded to the claimant; defendant to pay £15,000 on account of costs, subject to detailed assessment if not agreed.
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Directors Disqualification, Payment on Account
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Official Receiver
Claimant
David Philip Arron
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Company Directors Disqualification / Judgment on Costs Following Substantive Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the unsuccessful party should pay the successful party's costs
- 2 Whether a payment on account of costs should be ordered and in what amount
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant, as the successful party, is entitled to its costs, and there is no good reason to depart from the general rule. A payment on account of £15,000 is reasonable, representing a greater margin for assessment uncertainty than the claimant's request.
Court Disposition
Costs awarded to the claimant; defendant to pay £15,000 on account of costs, subject to detailed assessment if not agreed.
Orders
- Defendant to pay claimant's costs, subject to detailed assessment if not agreed.
- Defendant to pay £15,000 on account of costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment