Sova Capital Ltd (Company Number 04621383), Re [2023] EWHC 452 (Ch) (02 March 2023)
The court approved the transaction as a proper exercise of the JSAs' powers, finding it does not infringe the pari passu principle, represents the best price reasonably obtainable in the circumstances, is supported by the overwhelming majority of creditors, and is deliverable. The court held that the JSAs acted prudently and did not surrender their discretion.
- Citation
- [2023] EWHC 452 (Ch)
- Parties
- Applicant: David Philip Soden; Applicant: Ian Colin Wormleighton; Applicant: Stephen Browne; Company in Special Administration: Sova Capital Limited; Interested Party/respondent: Boris Zilbermints; Interested Party: LLC Holding Company Dominanta
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 March 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Special Administration Application / Final Hearing on Approval of Asset Transfer Transaction
- Outcome
- Application granted; court approves the transaction.
- Legal Topics
- Special Administration, Sanctions, Asset Realisation, Creditor Claims, Pari Passu Principle
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David Philip Soden
Applicant
Ian Colin Wormleighton
Applicant
Stephen Browne
Applicant
Sova Capital Limited
Company in Special Administration
Boris Zilbermints
Interested Party/respondent
LLC Holding Company Dominanta
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Special Administration Application / Final Hearing on Approval of Asset Transfer Transaction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed transaction infringes the pari passu principle
- 2 Whether the transaction is within the powers of the joint special administrators
- 3 Whether the transaction represents the best price reasonably obtainable for the Russian securities
Ratio Decidendi
The court approved the transaction as a proper exercise of the JSAs' powers, finding it does not infringe the pari passu principle, represents the best price reasonably obtainable in the circumstances, is supported by the overwhelming majority of creditors, and is deliverable. The court held that the JSAs acted prudently and did not surrender their discretion.
Court Disposition
Application granted; court approves the transaction.
Orders
- JSAs are at liberty to enter into the Dominanta Transaction and Further Dominanta Transaction as set out in PTA1 and PTA2.
- JSAs may procure Sova to perform the transactions with Dominanta.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment