Thomas v Dawson & Anor
The judge was entitled to attribute a significant value to Ms. Dawson’s share, considering the value of control, the income stream, and the ability to enforce derivative judgments. The solution adopted was within the broad statutory discretion and was not procedurally unfair.
- Parties
- Appellant: David Thomas; Respondent: Catriona Dawson
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 July 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Chancery Division Judgment on Unfair Prejudice Petition
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Prejudice, Share Valuation, Section 996 Companies Act 2006, Quasi Partnership, Judicial Discretion
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David Thomas
Appellant
Catriona Dawson
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Chancery Division Judgment on Unfair Prejudice Petition
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the judge erred in awarding £55,000 for the respondent's share despite balance sheet insolvency
- 2 Whether there was procedural unfairness in departing from expert valuation evidence
Ratio Decidendi
The judge was entitled to attribute a significant value to Ms. Dawson’s share, considering the value of control, the income stream, and the ability to enforce derivative judgments. The solution adopted was within the broad statutory discretion and was not procedurally unfair.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Mr. Thomas entitled to purchase Ms. Dawson’s share for £55,000 within three months of the order, with £28,416.83 payable to the company in discharge of judgment against Ms. Dawson and the balance to Ms. Dawson.
- Upon completion, Ms. Dawson to resign as officer of the company.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment