Dr Malay Haldar & Anor v Dawn Crook & Anor

Dr Malay Haldar & Anor v Dawn Crook & Anor

Both the 2022 and 2024 claims have been struck out by prior orders for non-compliance with unless orders and failure to provide proper particulars of claim; no valid application to reinstate has been made; interim payments cannot be ordered in claims that do not exist.

Parties
Claimant: Dr Malay Haldar; Claimant: Dr Sreela Halder; Defendant: Dawn Crook; Defendant: Gavin Brown; Defendant: Case Progression Office, Administrative Court; Defendant: Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust; Defendant: General Medical Council; Defendant: Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
19 March 2026
Procedural Posture
Civil / Ruling on Interim Payment Application and Procedural Strike Out
Outcome
Application dismissed; claims struck out; prior orders remain in effect; matter referred for possible civil restraint order.
Legal Topics
Strike Out, Interim Payments, Default Judgment, Civil Restraint Orders, Court Orders Validity, Appeals, Collateral Challenge, Abuse of Process
Civil Procedure Judicial Review Professional Regulation Strike Out Interim Payments Default Judgment Civil Restraint Orders Court Orders Validity +3 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dr Malay Haldar

Claimant

Dr Sreela Halder

Claimant

Dawn Crook

Defendant

Gavin Brown

Defendant

Case Progression Office, Administrative Court

Defendant

Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust

Defendant

General Medical Council

Defendant

Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Ruling on Interim Payment Application and Procedural Strike Out

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the 2022 and 2024 claims remain live or have been struck out
  2. 2 Whether interim payments can be ordered in struck-out claims
  3. 3 Validity of court orders absent published written judgments

Ratio Decidendi

Both the 2022 and 2024 claims have been struck out by prior orders for non-compliance with unless orders and failure to provide proper particulars of claim; no valid application to reinstate has been made; interim payments cannot be ordered in claims that do not exist.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed; claims struck out; prior orders remain in effect; matter referred for possible civil restraint order.

Orders

  • 2022 and 2024 claims declared struck out
  • Application for interim payments dismissed