Samarenko v Dawn Hill House Ltd
The requirement to pay the deposit was a fundamental term of the contract. The defendant's failure to pay the deposit by the deadline, after notice making time of the essence, constituted a repudiatory breach entitling the claimant to terminate the contract. No implied term excused non-payment, and the notice period was sufficient.
- Parties
- Claimant: Alexi Samarenko; Defendant: Dawn Hill House Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 July 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Summary Judgment Application
- Outcome
- Summary judgment for claimant
- Legal Topics
- Repudiatory Breach, Deposit Payment, Termination of Contract, Implied Terms, Summary Judgment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alexi Samarenko
Claimant
Dawn Hill House Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Summary Judgment Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether failure to pay the deposit constituted a repudiatory breach entitling the claimant to terminate the contract
- 2 Whether any implied term excused the defendant's non-payment of the deposit
- 3 Whether the notice period for payment was sufficient to make time of the essence
Ratio Decidendi
The requirement to pay the deposit was a fundamental term of the contract. The defendant's failure to pay the deposit by the deadline, after notice making time of the essence, constituted a repudiatory breach entitling the claimant to terminate the contract. No implied term excused non-payment, and the notice period was sufficient.
Court Disposition
Summary judgment for claimant
Orders
- Declaration that the contract as varied was validly terminated
- Order for vacation of notices at the Land Registry
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment