Maccaba v Lichtenstein
Section 2 of the Defamation Act 1952 does not preserve the common law distinction between offices of honour and offices of profit; any office suffices. The words alleged are capable of being likely to disparage the Claimant in his business and offices, and the issue should be left to the jury.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr Brian Yosef MACCABA; Defendant: Dayan Yisroel Yaakov LICHTENSTEIN
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 July 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory Application for Judgment on Slander Claim
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Slander, Special Damage, Defamation Act 1952, Offices of Honour and Profit
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Brian Yosef MACCABA
Claimant
Dayan Yisroel Yaakov LICHTENSTEIN
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Application for Judgment on Slander Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the slander alleged is actionable per se without proof of special damage under section 2 of the Defamation Act 1952
- 2 Whether the offices held by the Claimant qualify under section 2 of the Defamation Act 1952
- 3 Whether the distinction between offices of honour and offices of profit survives the 1952 Act
Ratio Decidendi
Section 2 of the Defamation Act 1952 does not preserve the common law distinction between offices of honour and offices of profit; any office suffices. The words alleged are capable of being likely to disparage the Claimant in his business and offices, and the issue should be left to the jury.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Judgment not entered for the Defendant on the claims in slander; issue to proceed to the jury
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment