DB v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions & Anor
The First-tier Tribunal did not err in including the variation issue within the scope of the appeals, as the Tribunal's inquisitorial jurisdiction permits consideration of any issue relevant to the maintenance calculation raised by any party, and submissions to the Tribunal can constitute a valid variation application if statutory requirements are met.
- Parties
- Appellant: DB; 1st Respondent: Secretary of State for Work and Pensions; 2nd Respondent: CE
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 31 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Upper Tribunal Determination on Papers
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Child Support, Variation of Maintenance Calculation, Tribunal Jurisdiction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
DB
Appellant
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
1st Respondent
CE
2nd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Upper Tribunal Determination on Papers
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the First-tier Tribunal had jurisdiction to consider a variation application raised by the respondent during an appeal
- 2 Whether the Tribunal could direct the Secretary of State to exercise statutory functions regarding variation applications
- 3 Whether submissions made to the Tribunal can constitute a valid variation application under the Child Support Act
Ratio Decidendi
The First-tier Tribunal did not err in including the variation issue within the scope of the appeals, as the Tribunal's inquisitorial jurisdiction permits consideration of any issue relevant to the maintenance calculation raised by any party, and submissions to the Tribunal can constitute a valid variation application if statutory requirements are met.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Stay on proceedings in the First-tier Tribunal is lifted
- Appeals may now proceed in the First-tier Tribunal
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment